Jarred Cosart is under research after tweets alleging he may have ties to gambling.
Jarred Cosart is currently slotted in as a key starting pitcher on the Miami Marlins 2015 roster.
But just days before the day that is opening of Major League Baseball period, Cosart has become the subject of an investigation over or perhaps a pitcher has ties to the world of gambling, one thing baseball has historically taken extremely seriously.
The story began on Tuesday night, when Twitter user @GhostFadeKillah, an account which often tweets out sports betting advice, tweeted an image of just what he reported was a direct message from Cosart’s account (@JarredCosart) to another gambling colleague.
In the image, Cosart says that he bets ‘LARGE,’ and that he had been ‘lookin for a few help anywhere I can.’ He additionally mentions taking earlier in the day advice that is betting the account, saying that he ‘hammered it.’ Another image talked about wagering in the NCAA basketball tournament.
Images Get Viral, New Cosart Account Appears
It didn’t take long before the images went viral in gambling circles, and right after that, it had been seen in certain corners of this baseball world. Within hours, Cosart set their Twitter account to private, and then soon removed it entirely. On Thursday morning, there was a brand new account purporting to belong to Cosart under the name @CosartJL, which denied that he was involved with betting, especially on baseball.
‘Around two weeks hence, my Twitter account was accessed by somebody else,’ the account that is new. ‘ They began to send incriminating DM’s to a amount of accounts to make it appear that I am addicted to gambling & have bet on baseball.’
‘I have not, nor will I ever, bet on the game of baseball,’ Cosart concluded.
That second account ended up being quickly deleted, and based on Miami Herald sports writer Manny Navarro, even the Marlins weren’t able to confirm whether that second account really was connected to the young pitcher.
MLB Takes Gambling Seriously for Historical Reasons
Given the quantity of doubt in the situation, it’s no shock that Major League Baseball would investigate what’s going on here. Pat Courtney, Chief Communications Officer for Major League Baseball, confirmed to your Miami Information Times that the league is looking at the allegations.
If that seems like an overreaction to a few tweets from an anonymous source, it’s important to understand the context in which baseball views gambling.
Ever since the Black Sox Scandal of 1919, in which a few members of the White Sox conspired to repair the global World Series, baseball has taken allegations of betting on games by players, managers or officials excessively really. More recently, Pete Rose was prohibited from baseball after allegations which he managed in that he bet on baseball games.
Just last year, it was revealed that MLB officials had undertaken a thorough investigation after there were allegations that Pirates pitcher Jeff Locke had engaged in game-fixing in 2012. In the end, it ended up that Locke was indeed framed by a bettor who had been annoyed at Locke for the recognized slight to the bettor’s cousin.
Cosart will be entering his year that is third in major leagues this year. In the last two years, he has compiled a 3.26 ERA. He originally came up with the Houston Astros, but ended up being exchanged to the Marlins last summer time.
Kentucky Wildcats Still Big Favorite Heading Into Sweet Sixteen
Kentucky is still an even-money favorite to win the NCAA Tournament. (Image: Andy Lyons)
March Madness started with a few major upsets and some exciting buzzer beaters, but most of the favorites remain into the field heading into the second weekend of the NCAA Basketball Tournament.
That ensures that going into the Sweet Sixteen, it is still the Kentucky Wildcats that are the odds-on favorite to walk away with a title that is national an undefeated season whenever the competition wraps up next weekend in Indianapolis.
True, the Wildcats did not look their most useful in their second-round victory that is 64-51 the Cincinnati Bearcats, a casino game that saw Cincinnati hold a lead for the first 17 minutes before Kentucky started to take close control.
But a single reasonably close game against a decent team is not likely to move the needle much for bookmakers, and Kentucky is still considered a straight money (offer or take a bit either way) favorite to take the title down.
Western Virginia Confident Heading Into Kentucky Clash
Needless to say, there are plenty of teams out there that think they can provide Kentucky a casino game. The Wildcats’ first test will come Thursday evening, when they accept the West Virginia Mountaineers, the 5th seed in the Midwest region. And while Kentucky gets in the game as a 13.5 point favorite, West Virginia certainly isn’t counting themselves down yet.
‘I let them have their props,’ stated West Virginia freshman Daxter Miles Jr. on Wednesday. ‘Salute them to getting to 36-0. But the next day they’re gonna be 36-1.’
Arizona, Duke, Gonzaga, and Wisconsin Among Staying Contenders
As of this stage associated with tournament, no one can get an opponent they can simply walk over, additionally the other favorites in the tournament may also face tests into the rounds in the future. Arizona, a 13/2 choice that is second win the championship with many bookmakers, takes on Xavier Thursday night. Should they win, they would then have to take on winner of Wisconsin vs. North Carolina; Wisconsin is the top seed within the West Region, and an 8/1 pick to win the tournament.
Two other contenders continue to be alive in the South Region, where the next games will be played on Friday night. Top seed Duke will take on Utah, while second-seeded Gonzaga will have to contend with traditional powerhouse UCLA. Duke is essentially a second-choice that is joint win the tournament along with Arizona at about 13/2 odds, while Gonzaga could be backed at about 11/1.
Wichita State Could Get Rematch with Kentucky
Of course, March Madness is all about the surprising Cinderella stories, and there are still a couple of smaller schools with hopes of playing spoiler in the tournament. Perhaps the most compelling of these teams is Wichita State, which taxes on Notre Dame evening thursday.
The Shockers are really a two-point favorite heading into that matchup, and are thought a 25-1 underdog to win a championship that is national. Should Wichita State win, they’d get Kentucky in the quarterfinals: a rematch of a 78-76 win by Kentucky in the Round of 32 last year, by which Kentucky ended Wichita State’s dream of an undefeated season.
The Women’s National Championship is also heading into its Sweet Sixteen this weekend, though it had an even more dominant favorite than the Kentucky men for those looking for even more March Madness. The Connecticut ladies’ team is the overwhelming choice to win a national title this season: they’ll enter their next game against Texas as a 28.5-point favorite, and FiveThirtyEight.com estimates that UConn has a 77 percent chance to win the entire tournament.
RAWA Rhetoric Sweeps Home Subcommittee Meeting in Federal Online Gambling Debate
Utah Representative Jason Chaffetz, a RAWA Congressional sponsor and finger-wagger towards the stars, left the hearing whenever he wasn’t actually asking a relevant question or involved in its response.
The hearing that is congressional the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) was finally unleashed on Capitol Hill yesterday, chaired by Representative Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), whom introduced the bill early this year.
The hearing had been mostly criticized in the run-up, because the witnesses due to testify were by and large against on line gambling and pro-RAWA, and there have been no surprises for the reason that arena once invited speakers had their say.
From the moment that Louie Gohmert, chairman of your house Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations, kicked things off by grappling using the states’ liberties concern, it looked such as the issue was headed for a fairly one-sided discussion.
‘We must explore ways to protect the legal rights of states to stop Internet that is unwanted gambling creeping across their borders,’ he reasoned. ‘Updating the Wire Act could be a tool to safeguard states’ rights to prohibit gambling activity.’
Enthused by this exciting interpretation that is new of, Chaffetz took that ball and ran with it. ‘I believe [RAWA] is really a state’s rights bill, and I believe it’s the rights of states like Utah and Hawaii, where we’ve no gaming, to guard ourselves from something that we wouldn’t normally prefer to see within our edges,’ he declared.
This, before a testimony that is single been heard.
The witness that is first John Kindt, a professor during the University of Illinois Law School, who wasted almost no time in condemning online gambling as the ‘crack cocaine of gambling.’
Kindt is keen on the it’s-true-because-it-rhymes brand of rhetoric, a passion he shares with Sheldon Adelson: ‘Click your phone, lose your home’ he quipped. ‘Click your mouse, lose your household,’ he added, in the event you did not get the brilliant poetry with the example that is first.
In fact, Adelson likes the exact same types of phrases, which he himself coined. Maybe Not that he’s behind all this, of program.
Kindt is additionally keen on quoting from outdated studies, such once the one commissioned by Congress in 1999, the full days of dial-up Internet, which concluded that ‘Internet gaming is impossible to regulate’ and so should be prohibited at all costs.
Next up was Andrew Moylan, executive director and senior other at R Street Institute, a conservative-libertarian tank that is think. Moylan had been a late addition to the variety of witnesses, a concession, maybe, to criticism of the largely partisan panel.
However, he confusingly reported which he had been not particularly knowledgeable about or interested in gambling. Instead, he was right here to ‘articulate a conception of limited government and federalism as it relates to gambling legislation.’
Moylan noted that RAWA and its blanket ban on online gambling was at odds using the axioms of federalism as well as the ‘more narrowly targeted language regarding the original Wire Act and UIGEA.’ Both the Wire Act and UIGEA, he stated, had been enacted to greatly help states in their own law enforcement pursuits.
He also said that RAWA ‘potentially establishes a dangerous precedent by suggesting that the mere use of a communication platform like the internet subjects all users and all activity to the reach of this federal government, regardless of its location or its nature.’
Les Says More
Les Bernal, shown here during a 60 Minutes interview along with his ubiquitously expression that is shocked had nothing good to state about on line gambling, or gambling period.
Les Bernal, nationwide director of the Stop Predatory Gambling Foundation, was up next to state his moral objection to all or any kinds of gambling. It’s Bernal’s opinion that states are forcing online gambling on a reluctant and populace that is terrified.
‘States, in partnership with commercial gambling operators, are forcing these gambling games onto people. If you don’t the federal government, whom will step in to protect the rights of individuals, your constituents, against these practices by an active, predatory state?’
A Moment’s Silence
Michael K. Fagan, adjunct professor of law at Washington University class of Law, was able to unplug his television microphone as he was asked to go it closer towards him, which implied that the first half his speech ended up being carried out in complete silence, as far as the world wide web flow viewers were concerned.
While we are no professionals on lip-reading, we’re fairly sure we could make out the words ‘terrorism,’ ‘money,’ and ‘launderers’ repeated several times over. The theme of the second, more half that is audible of speech advised that this had been the case so we resisted the desire to show the volume back down.
Finally, Parry Aftab, executive director of cyber safety advice team WiredSafety, seemed to be the witness that is only had taken the time for you to talk to operators and regulators in the states that had actually legalized online gaming.