Milford, Massachusetts Voters Reject Foxwoods Casino Proposal

These Milford, Massachusetts anti-Foxwoods Casino protesters carried the day as soon as the project was defeated by voters recently (Image supply: AP Photo/Steven Senne)

Sorry, Foxwoods: it seems you are not desired in Massachusetts, either. The Connecticut gambling giant had been soundly defeated at the polls this as voters in the town of Milford, Massachusetts decided that they didn’t want a casino resort in their backyards week.

Three Down for the voter that is( Count

This is becoming a story that is routine Massachusetts, where voters rejected proposals in East Boston and Palmer earlier this thirty days. In this instance, Foxwoods had been searching to build a $1 billion complex in the Boston-area town to compete for that region’s sole casino license.

Once the first returns started coming in, it absolutely was clear that the casino vote wasn’t going to get Foxwoods’ way. CEO Scott Butera quickly conceded defeat when the polls closed, telling casino supporters that the vote meant that plans for the casino would absolutely not be in the years ahead. Once all the votes were in, the margin ended up being enormous: 6,361 against the plan, and 3,480 because of it, or about a 65%-35% split.

Foxwoods spent a sizable amount of cash advertising the casino, but it had beenn’t enough to convince locals that it was a great deal for the neighborhood economy, apparently. As they promoted the fact that there could be numerous brand new jobs created and much more than $30 million in new income for the town, the opposition carried the day.

‘Our city wasn’t for sale,’ stated John Seaver of the group that is anti-casino Milford. ‘They desired to come in and phone the shots, and they almost did. But the people rose up, pushed straight back and overwhelmingly stated ‘this town isn’t for sale.”

Opponents warned that adding a casino resort could increase criminal activity into the town, along with depress property values. That, along with warnings of massive traffic jams, was seemingly enough to convince most residents that are milford vote ‘no’.

According to Butera, though, the real problem is that myths about casino gambling are influencing voters, significantly more than arguments in favor of creating the resorts.

‘I think individuals are afraid of the unknown,’ Butera said. ‘There’s lots of myths in what gambling enterprises are…they are not these crazy hedonistic places. They are actually very nice resorts that have much more to do [than] just games.’

The Milford vote was the final one planned at least for the right time being among a string of binding referendums held by towns over whether they would approve gambling enterprises built in their towns. Applications can still come set for the three casino licenses and the one slot parlor license in the state before the end of the year, but.

Although the results that are recent casino companies have actually been poor in these votes, other companies have experienced more success. Both Wynn Resorts and MGM have successfully had projects approved by their neighborhood communities, allowing them to compete for licenses in the Greater Boston Area and Massachusetts that is western. Three towns have previously supported plans to build smaller slots parlors in their communities, though only one will ultimately get a license from the state

Other jobs nevertheless hang within the stability. Mohegan Sun narrowly destroyed a vote to approve a casino in Palmer so narrowly, in reality, that they are getting a formal recount regarding the results later on this month. Meanwhile, Suffolk Downs in East Boston is thinking about the risk of changing their plan and placing the entirety of these casino resort in neighboring Revere, which voted in favor of allowing them to build there.

New Jersey Online Gambling Soft Release Is Not Without Glitches

The latest Jersey online casino soft launch has not been without some snafus. Which is why, ahem, you do soft launches.

New Jersey’s soft launch of these online gambling platform was, for the most part, a success. The games work, the sites are up and running, therefore the verification systems are doing their job. In reality, the only real problem is that those systems were working a little too hard, as quite several residents had trouble proving these were really in brand New Jersey.

We Have Launch…Sort Of

On Nov. 21, the launch that is soft of very first round of web gambling web sites went live for players located in New Jersey. During the soft launch which is made to weed any bugs out and ensure things were working as planned only about 500 players were permitted on each site. Nevertheless, genuine money play was available, making this the very first time state-regulated online gambling had occurred in New Jersey.

Seven casinos were approved to run websites at the time of the launch. The Borgata was included by them, Trump Plaza, the Taj Mahal, the Golden Nugget, Tropicana, Bally’s, and Caesars Atlantic City. Combined, those sites had the ability to run 14 gambling websites, including a combination of both casino and poker that is online.

Assuming all goes well in this soft launch period which expands to the ‘real’ launch date of Nov. 26 online gambling will be available to any or all residents in nj avove the age of 21 starting early next week. But according to some customers, there are surely kinks in the system that still need to be ironed out.

As we reported earlier, the most commonplace issue therefore far had been also the one that was the most predictable. Many individuals had trouble signing into the sites due to the fact that either the geolocation software getting used couldn’t be certain they had been in New Jersey, or they weren’t immediately able to meet other verification standards so that you can prove their residency.


For instance, some players attempted logging in from different locations and nevertheless couldn’t locate a option to access any of the web sites. New Jersey resident Joseph Brennen reportedly attempted to log in from a McDonald’s in Atlantic City, but was told by various sites that they couldn’t tell where he had been situated, or that they didn’t think he was in New Jersey. Then tried driving inland and north about five kilometers, but still couldn’t have the sites to recognize he was at the state.

Driving another ten kilometers inland and trying to connect from a restaurant additionally did not create any results. Though some associated with the sites now permitted him to register accounts, they nevertheless wanted some proof of residency such as for example a software application bill that he couldn’t instantly provide.

And Brennen wasn’t the one that is only went into such problems.

‘I made a small deposit, however when I tried to play they said I wasn’t in nj-new jersey,’ said Tina Gonzalez, who possessed a long call with customer care and saw her computer crash while attempting to create up an account on Caesars’ website. ‘I’m afraid that when they attempt to repeat this statewide on the 26th, it’s going to be mayhem.’

The inability to prove one’s location seemed to be more widespread while few people reported those kinds of technical problems. Even though many industry specialists predicted some people would get locked out of the sites due to being very close to the brand new Jersey edge, it is unclear why this was occurring up to 10 to 15 miles far from the state’s edges as well.

Ideally, these problems is going to be circumvented by the hard launch date to come.

‘ The opening that is soft be used to show the division that most systems perform as required underneath the stress of live gaming and that operational and revenue reporting controls work well. Staff will continually gauge the progress of each platform provider before enabling them to open gaming to the public that is general November 26,’ stated DGE Director David Rebuck in a statement.

London’s Hippodrome Brings in Door Dwarves Amidst Debate

Well-known little person and actor Peter Dinklage is unlikely to be applying at the Hippodrome (Image source: Frazer Harrison/Getty Images)

In a controversial move that could be viewed as exploitative or helpful according to your viewpoint who owns the Hippodrome, the casino that is largest in the united kingdom , has put out an advertisement to allow the planet understand he is looking to hire little individuals as ‘door dwarves’ at the venue for the vacations.

Risking being called a circus carney, the master promoted for the positions in the widely read Metro newspaper, stating that the casino is looking to ‘create a group of Britain’s tiniest bouncers Door Dwarves for the entrance that is new in Street.’

Owner Claims Success

In accordance with reports, trials of this initiative, which would introduce a force of individuals 4 legs 10 inches or smaller to man the entry to the casino, were said to have gone ‘fantastically’ well, and as a result, the management at the location has been convinced to introduce the system for a basis that is full-time.

CEO and chairman of the casino Simon Thomas, trying to justify the scheme, explained to the news that the device was just the latest in a line that is long of employment opportunities at the Leicester Square casino.

‘The Hippodrome is A london that is phenomenal organization. It opened in 1900 as a circus that is indoor individuals like Little Titch regarding the cast,’ explained Thomas, adding that legendary P.T. Barnum had circus performer and little person Tom Thumb perform at the place back in the time.

‘We had high-diving dwarves who dived from the mistrals’ gallery 60-feet up into a water tank,’ he added. ‘So they’re very part that is much of history of the place.’

How charming can you get. It’s like Cirque du Soleil, however the shortstuff version.

Interesting Logic

Since bouncers are typically very large, wide and menacing-looking characters, who the average Joe would prefer to not cross, hiring a team of smaller personnel does appear just like a strange move for the casino if they’re seeking to deter the riff-raff from causing trouble during the site.

‘Nobody messes with a dwarf, so in ways, they’ve been very good doorman,’ argued Thomas. ‘They can manage people superior to having an eclipse that is human the door as a number of the groups do in London. Nobody will probably pick on someone who is below-average height. It’s not exactly a thing that is macho do, therefore it is a brilliant way of managing the entranceway.

‘ There isn’t any discrimination at all,’ claimed Thomas, accumulating to borrow possibly the many over-used phrase associated with the twenty-first century to dispute complaints that the place can be poking fun at small people. ‘i find we live in a global world of political correctness gone angry.’

But if we are to take the opinion that the work role isn’t poking enjoyable at little people, should we possibly take the opinion it is, at the very least, exploiting them? Thomas himself stated that the initiative is ‘building on the rich heritage of innovative entertainment’ so clearly it is not just their unintimidating stature which he wants to use.

‘I have always been wanting to run a tremendously entertaining that is large and I also have lot of different people with plenty of different skills,’ explained the Hippodrome president. ‘we have chosen those skills and physical attributes that are appropriate to that work. These are typically highly professional and have got to start it.’

Book Now